DHARAMVEER SHARMA-issues for briefing

ISSUES FOR BRIEFING 

1. Whether the disputed site is the birth place of Bhagwan 
Ram?
The disputed site is the birth place of Lord Ram.  Place of 
birth is a juristic person and is a deity.   It is personified as the 
spirit  of  divine worshipped as birth place of  Lord Rama as a 
child. 
  Spirit of divine ever remains present every where at all 
times for any one to invoke at any shape or form in accordance 
with his own aspirations and it can be shapeless and formless 
also.


2. Whether  the disputed building was a mosque? When  
was it built? By whom? 
The disputed building  was constructed by Babar, the year 
is not certain but it was built against the tenets of Islam. Thus, it 
cannot have the character of a mosque.


3. Whether   the  mosque  was   built   after   demolishing   a  
Hindu temple?
The disputed structure was constructed on the site of old 
structure   after   demolition   of   the   same.  The   Archaeological 
Survey of   India has proved  that   the  structure was a massive 
Hindu religious structure.


4. Whether the idols were placed  in the building on the  
night of December 22/23rd
, 1949?
The idols were placed in the middle dome of the disputed 
structure in the intervening night of 22/23.12.1949.2


5. Whether any of the claims for title is time barred?
  O.O.S.  No.  4 of  1989,   the Sunni  Central  Board of  Waqfs 
U.P., Lucknow and others Vs. Gopal Singh Visharad and others 
and O.O.S.  No.3 of  1989,  Nirmohi  Akhara and Another Vs.  Sri 
Jamuna Prasad Singh and others are barred by time.


6.  What will be the status of the disputed site e.g. inner  
and outer courtyard?
    It  is established  that  the property  in suit   is  the site of 
Janm Bhumi of Ram Chandra Ji and Hindus in general  had the 
right to worship Charan, Sita Rasoi, other idols and other object 
of   worship   existed   upon   the   property   in   suit.   It   is   also 
established  that  Hindus have been worshipping  the place  in 
dispute as Janm Sthan i.e. a birth place as deity and visiting it as 
a sacred place of pilgrimage as of  right since time immemorial. 
After the construction of  the disputed structure it is proved the 
deities   were   installed   inside   the   disputed   structure   on 
22/23.12.1949. It is also proved that the outer courtyard was in 
exclusive   possession  of  Hindus   and   they  were  worshipping 
throughout   and   in   the   inner   courtyard   (in   the   disputed 
structure) they were also worshipping. It is also established that 
the disputed  structure  cannot  be  treated as  a mosque as   it 
came into existence against the tenets of Islam.